What term describes accepting compromises on features due to limited resources?

The term that accurately describes accepting compromises on features due to limited resources is "trade-off." A trade-off involves making a decision where certain features or requirements are sacrificed in order to achieve other goals, often due to constraints such as time, budget, or available resources. In project management and requirements analysis, trade-offs are common when balancing scope, quality, and costs.

In this context, recognizing and understanding trade-offs is crucial because stakeholders often need to prioritize which features are most critical for achieving project goals. This involves evaluating the implications of reducing features on overall project success. Therefore, trade-offs encompass the concept of balancing benefits against costs, leading to a solution that, while not ideal, is realistic given the constraints faced.

The other terms presented do not fully capture this nuance: negotiation refers to the discussion between parties to reach an agreement, a compromise solution implies a middle-ground arrangement without specifically addressing resource constraints, and feature limitation suggests absence or restriction without the contextual decision-making aspect inherent in trade-offs.